New York Attorney General Barbara Underwood and New York Governor Andrew Cuomo announced today that the state of New York, joined by the states of Connecticut, New Jersey and Maryland, have instituted a lawsuit against the federal government in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, seeking to strike the $10,000 cap imposed on the state and local tax (“SALT”) itemized deduction by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (“TCJA”) as unconstitutional.
The lawsuit, which specifically names Steven Mnuchin, U.S. Treasury Secretary and David Kautter, Acting Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service, as defendants, asserts that the SALT cap (previously discussed in an earlier blog post) was specifically enacted by the federal government to target New York and similarly situated states, that it interferes with a state’s right to make its own fiscal decisions, and that it disproportionately adversely impacts taxpayers in those states.
“New York will not be bullied. This cap is unconstitutional – going well beyond settled limits on federal power to impose an income tax…”
- AG Barbara Underwood
At its very essence, the plaintiff states are claiming that the SALT cap is unconstitutional because it goes beyond the federal government’s constitutional power to impose taxes. To support this position, Governor Cuomo has publicly stated that the SALT cap violates the 10th Amendment, the 16th Amendment and Article I, Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution. He has also stated that the cap will increase New Yorkers' federal taxes by more than $14.3 billion during this year alone, and over $135 billion in the aggregate during the next eight years.
"The federal government is hell-bent on using New York as a piggy bank to pay for corporate tax cuts and I will not stand for it."
- Gov. Andrew Cuomo
For the past few months, Governor Cuomo has threatened that he was going to file this lawsuit. He has repeatedly stated (in numerous forums) that the TCJA’s limitation on the SALT deduction at its very essence is nothing more than a Republican attack against the Democratic states (i.e., the “blue” states). Well, Governor Cuomo kept his word and filed the lawsuit!
The stakes are high. The legal theories are extremely interesting. The fight will likely be long and strong. The outcome will have far-reaching implications. The federal government as well as the taxpayers and the government leaders of New York, New Jersey, Maryland and Connecticut are not the only parties interested in the outcome of the case. The taxpayers and the leaders of the other high income tax states, including Oregon, California, Hawaii, Iowa, Minnesota, Vermont, Wisconsin, and the District of Columbia will be impacted by the outcome. All of these taxpayers and the leaders of their states will undoubtedly be keenly monitoring this case. Likewise, legal commentators and scholars will surely be closely following the action. I suspect the Attorneys General of many of the other high income tax states will join the fight or file amicus briefs in the case. Likewise, several legal/tax organizations and/or legal scholars will surely provide input to the Court by filing amicus briefs. While the plaintiffs’ battle appears to be uphill, it will be an interesting case in many respects, including tax and constitutional law. Stay tuned!
Larry J. Brant is a Shareholder in Garvey Schubert Barer, a law firm based out of the Pacific Northwest, with offices in Seattle, Washington; Portland, Oregon; New York, New York; Washington, D.C.; and Beijing, China. Mr. Brant practices in the Portland office. His practice focuses on tax, tax controversy and transactions. Mr. Brant is a past Chair of the Oregon State Bar Taxation Section. He was the long term Chair of the Oregon Tax Institute, and is currently a member of the Board of Directors of the Portland Tax Forum. Mr. Brant has served as an adjunct professor, teaching corporate taxation, at Northwestern School of Law, Lewis and Clark College. He is an Expert Contributor to Thomson Reuters Checkpoint Catalyst. Mr. Brant is a Fellow in the American College of Tax Counsel. He publishes articles on numerous income tax issues, including Taxation of S Corporations, Reasonable Compensation, Circular 230, Worker Classification, IRC § 1031 Exchanges, Choice of Entity, Entity Tax Classification, and State and Local Taxation. Mr. Brant is a frequent lecturer at local, regional and national tax and business conferences for CPAs and attorneys. He was the 2015 Recipient of the Oregon State Bar Tax Section Award of Merit.
Upcoming Speaking Engagements
- "The Road Between Subchapter C and Subchapter S – It May Be a Well-Traveled Two-Way Thoroughfare, but It Isn’t Free of Potholes and Obstacles," New York University Tax Conferences in July – Advanced Conference on Subchapter SNew York NY, 7.25.19
- "Tax Law Update for Family Law Practitioners," Oregon State Bar - Family Law Section 2019 Annual ConferenceSunriver, OR, 10.10.19-10.12.19
- "The Road Between Subchapter C and Subchapter S – It May Be a Well-Traveled Two-Way Thoroughfare, but It Isn’t Free of Potholes and Obstacles," New York University 78th Institute on Federal TaxationNew York, NY, 10.20.19-10.25.19
- "Subchapter S After the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act – the Good, the Bad and the Ugly," Oregon Society of Certified Public Accountants (OSCPA) 2019 Northwest Federal Tax ConferencePortland, OR, 10.28.19
- "The Road Between Subchapter C and Subchapter S – It May Be a Well-Traveled Two-Way Thoroughfare, but It Isn’t Free of Potholes and Obstacles," New York University 78th Institute on Federal TaxationSan Francisco, CA, 11.10.19–11.15.19